Assignment 5 (Chapter 5)
| DOC |
1. The imposition of a tariff on imported steel for the home country results in:
|
2. Which of the following refers to a market-sharing pact negotiated by trading partners to moderate the intensity of international competition?
|
3. Suppose the government grants a subsidy to domestic producers of an import-competing good. The subsidy tends to result in deadweight losses for the domestic economy in the form of the:
|
4. Domestic content legislation applied to autos would tend to:
|
5. Assume the U.S. has a competitive advantage in producing calculators, while the rest of the world has a competitive advantage in steel. Suppose the U.S. and the rest of the world enter into an agreement to lower import quotas below existing levels on calculators and steel. Which of the following would least likely occur for the U.S.? Rising levels of:
|
6. The practice of Canadian firms dumping their products in Sweden poses a problem for economic policymakers since dumping tends to:
|
7. The United Auto Workers union attempted to win the approval of legislation that would moderate the practice of foreign sourcing on the part of American auto manufacturers. Which of the following best represents this legislation?
|
8. From the perspective of the American public as a whole, export subsidies levied by overseas governments on goods sold to the United States:
|
9. If import licenses are auctioned off to domestic importers in a competitive market, their scarcity value (revenue effect) accrues to:
|
10. A specification of a maximum amount of a foreign produced good that will be allowed to enter the country over a given time period is referred to as a(n):
|
11. To maintain that South Koreans are dumping their VCRs in the United States is to maintain that:
|
| 12. Figure 5.1 illustrates the steel market for Mexico, assumed to be a "small" country that is unable to affect the world price. Suppose the world price of steel is given and constant at $200 per ton. Now suppose the Mexican steel industry is able to obtain trade protection, as discussed in the questions below. Answer the question(s) on the basis of this information.
Figure 5.1. Alternative Nontariff Trade Barriers Levied by a "Small" Country
Consider Figure 5.1. With free trade, the quantity of steel imported by Mexico equals:
|
| 13. Figure 5.1 illustrates the steel market for Mexico, assumed to be a "small" country that is unable to affect the world price. Suppose the world price of steel is given and constant at $200 per ton. Now suppose the Mexican steel industry is able to obtain trade protection, as discussed in the questions below. Answer the question(s) on the basis of this information.
Figure 5.1. Alternative Nontariff Trade Barriers Levied by a "Small" Country
Refer to Figure 5.1. Suppose the Mexican government imposes an import quota equal to 2 tons of steel. If foreign exporters behave as monopoly sellers, and Mexican importers behave as competitive buyers, the overall welfare loss of the quota to Mexico equals:
|
| 14. Figure 5.1 illustrates the steel market for Mexico, assumed to be a "small" country that is unable to affect the world price. Suppose the world price of steel is given and constant at $200 per ton. Now suppose the Mexican steel industry is able to obtain trade protection, as discussed in the questions below. Answer the question(s) on the basis of this information.
Figure 5.1. Alternative Nontariff Trade Barriers Levied by a "Small" Country
Refer to Figure 5.1. Suppose the Mexican government imposes an import quota equal to 2 tons of steel. If the Mexican government auctions import licenses to the highest foreign bidder, the overall welfare loss of the quota to Mexico equals:
|
| 15. Figure 5.1 illustrates the steel market for Mexico, assumed to be a "small" country that is unable to affect the world price. Suppose the world price of steel is given and constant at $200 per ton. Now suppose the Mexican steel industry is able to obtain trade protection, as discussed in the questions below. Answer the question(s) on the basis of this information.
Figure 5.1. Alternative Nontariff Trade Barriers Levied by a "Small" Country
Consider Figure 5.1. Suppose instead that the Mexican government provides a subsidy of $200 per ton to its steel producers, as indicated by the supply schedule SM (with subsidy). The quantity of imports equals:
|
| 16. Figure 5.2 illustrates the revenue and cost conditions of ABC Inc. which sells calculators in Canada and France. On the basis of this information, answer the question(s).
Figure 5.2. International Dumping
Consider Figure 5.2. Compared with the total revenue and total profit that ABC Inc. realizes in the absence of dumping, with dumping the firm attains a:
|
| 17. Figure 5.3 illustrates the apple market for Sweden, assumed to be a "small" country that is unable to affect the world price. SSweden is the domestic supply and DSweden is the domestic demand. SSweden+Quota is Sweden's supply schedule with an import quota. On the basis of this information answer the question(s).
Figure 5.3. Sweden's Apple Market
Consider Figure 5.3. In the absence of trade, Sweden's equilibrium price and quantity of apples would be:
|
| 18. Figure 5.3 illustrates the apple market for Sweden, assumed to be a "small" country that is unable to affect the world price. SSweden is the domestic supply and DSweden is the domestic demand. SSweden+Quota is Sweden's supply schedule with an import quota. On the basis of this information answer the question(s).
Figure 5.3. Sweden's Apple Market
Consider Figure 5.3. At the free-trade price of $0.60 per pound, Sweden's consumer surplus totals $____ and producer surplus totals $____.
|
| 19. Figure 5.3 illustrates the apple market for Sweden, assumed to be a "small" country that is unable to affect the world price. SSweden is the domestic supply and DSweden is the domestic demand. SSweden+Quota is Sweden's supply schedule with an import quota. On the basis of this information answer the question(s).
Figure 5.3. Sweden's Apple Market
Consider Figure 5.3. As a result of the quota, Sweden's consumer surplus:
|
20. A voluntary export agreement:
|
21. When voluntary export limits are imposed on the world's chief exporter:
|
22. Concerning international dumping, many economists argue that "fair value" should be based on:
|
23. An elimination of nontariff barriers on apples tends to increase apple imports, reduce profits of import-competing apple producers, and generate job losses for domestic apple workers.
|
24. Sporadic (distress) dumping would occur if domestic orange producers dispose of an excess quantity of oranges, resulting from an abnormally large harvest, by selling them at lower prices abroad than at home.
|
25. If the Australian government imposes a domestic content requirement of 75 percent on autos, at least 25 percent of an auto's value must be produced in a foreign country if that auto is to be sold in Australia.
|
Copyright 2008,
by the Contributing Authors.
Cite/attribute Resource.
admin. (2006, January 05). Assignment 5 (Chapter 5). Retrieved August 29, 2008, from Free Online Course Materials — USU OpenCourseWare Web site: http://ocw.usu.edu/Economics/International_Economics/Assignment5.htm.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.


















